Several people claim that mass media should distribute information relating to investigating researchers or about whole world features while others against that it may bring some negative effects to shared it without control. These both sides have their own significance and I will consider each of them before giving any opinion.
To begin with, spread information was always crucial for the government to notify the community about last news. Firstly, every people desire to know about new information and today each of the people can gather it without effort. For instance, the internet brings a plethora of opportunities to seek any type of information and this contributes to raising people knowledge. Numerous videos related to the business field promote boosting multiple youth businessman who possessing huge benefits for government. In addition, science university students who preparing projects have access to explore research methods by virtue of information provided by someone resulting in them to the auspicious occasion. Therefore, sharing information has many beneficial effects that impact the environment.
However, the main concern of information is damaging for a youngster with harmful statements. Children are responsible to memorize adverse information which promotes them to do the worst things. Aside from the negative effects for kids, the amount of spurious information on TV is rising despite the effort to control false information. Consequently, there will be inevitable consequences which people will suffer in the future such as disloyalty to the government.
To conclude, from my point of view sharing information leads to beneficial consequences as well negative so it depends on people how we will consider it.
- These days young children spend a lot of time using computers tablets and smart phones Some people think that introducing children to technology at a young age is beneficial others believe that they would benefit more from playing traditional games D 93
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world.What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 56
- The chart below, shows the amount of money per spent on fast foods in britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 73
- Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet but there is not enough political action to control excessive consumerism and pollution Do you agree 78
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60377358491 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98708266865 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3482948249 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221412612004 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740265377482 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486936917932 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134665450398 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291236370924 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.