the given charts compare the manufacture of electricity from 5 sources( coal, petroleum, natural gas, nuclear and hydro) in New Zealand and Germany from 1980 to 2010
Overall, it is clear that the spending of coal, which was used to produce electrical energy, was the most in both the stations over 3 decades with an exception in 2010 in Germany, the number of energy from nuclear jumping to the top. The measure is units.
in 1980, the consumption of coal to make electricity was the largest with 56 units in New Zealand, which was double that in Germany. In contrast, the German produced electricity from the nuclear source at 20 units while New Zealand still didn’t use this item. Furthermore, there was a relatively similar at the Natural gas source, all of their regard created as many as approximately 30.
Over 30 years later, three-fourths of total energy was produced from the coal ( 150 units) in New Zealand meanwhile this part in Germany belonged to the nuclear source( 155 units). The second rank in 30 earlier years, the Natural source got rit of, the electricity manufactured from it went down significantly to become the least with 2 units in both locations. In an other hand, in New Zealand witnessed an increased slightly in the spending Hydro by 16 units. the figure for Petroleum and Coal made electricity the same(27 units).
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.Discuss both these views and five your own opinion 84
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 73
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country An alternative view is that they can adapt to a new environment by establishing a minority community Discuss these both two views and give your opinion 69
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the given charts compare the manufacture of...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ping to the top. The measure is units. in 1980, the consumption of coal to make e...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to make electricity was the largest with 56 units in New Zealand, which was doubl...
^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... total energy was produced from the coal 150 units in New Zealand meanwhile this ...
^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...east with 2 units in both locations. In an other hand, in New Zealand witnessed an incre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...htly in the spending Hydro by 16 units. the figure for Petroleum and Coal made elec...
^^^
Line 4, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Coal made electricity the same27 units.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84782608696 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68950561511 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.107103138 43.030603864 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250718004518 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989988053514 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752339138049 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1833617187 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10403696639 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.