The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on
vital public services such as schools and hospitals.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, governments in many countries have been spending huge funds on space exploration projects. This essay will discuss why I consider this attitude as a waste of money and that this money should be allocated to serve the community.
To begin with, these are various reasons why I believe that such space projects should be abandoned. Firstly, these programmes are extremely expensive in terms of the qualified training required for the staff and the special equipment used to complete the missions. Consequently, while this put a substantial pressure on the government's budget, these funds could be assigned to develop the society in different ways and within various fields. Secondly, space travels are considered a real danger since many of them fail to return to the earth; as a result, they cost many astronauts their lives. Finally, not only are space programmes consume an enormous part of the country's economy, but also most of them do not present benefits to the people's lives.
On the other hand, I claim that it is much more economically efficient for governments to allocate their finances to other sectors that worth improvement because they tend to create direct positive impact on the community and its members. This is because whereas training astronauts can cost a fortune, it is much cheaper to prepare qualified engineers, doctors, police and other skilled workers who serve the country. Furthermore, unlike the hazards of space programmes, the risks of pubic service work can be easily limited through safety procedures. Besides the lower cost and limited risks, these careers present vital advantages to the public as reducing poverty rates, improving the country's infrastructure, reforming education and curing diseases. Therefore, People will take the advantage of these services on the short term and on the long term.
In conclusion, despite the fact that more funds are being spent on space discoveries in the recent times, I do claim that these expenditures should be cut down and that governments would assign more budget for the public service instead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-28 | harmankaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | Salma Mohamed | 84 | view |
- Every culture throughout time has recorded its history in one way or another In what ways can history be passed on to the next generation Why is history important to society 95
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do so many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem? 78
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job.Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment. In your letterdescribe the problem with the equipmentexplain how this problem is affecting your wor 78
- Every culture, throughout time, has recorded its history in one way or another.In what ways can history be passed on to the next generation?Why is history important to society? 56
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent onvital public services such as schools and hospitals.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 486, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...zards of space programmes, the risks of pubic service work can be easily limited thro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22848664688 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71214019947 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578635014837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5850029181 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.538461538 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2307692308 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184871111728 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602326247936 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557927447432 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122624357209 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633445736107 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.