should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Transportation is an important part of our lives. We spend an essential part of our time going from one place to another. Governments always try to do their best to improve the quality of transportation and that’s why it has an essential part of any election plan. One of the heated debates in this realm is whether governments should spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation. In my view, governments should spend more on public transportation for two reasons.
First, public transportation is better for nature. Due to the increasingly inclining population, the number of used cars has increased dramatically. These cars are producing carbon dioxide gas which caused the global warming problem. If governments spend more on public transportation, it will encourage more people to use it. For instance, I am living in a very crowded city called Istanbul. The main transportation method here is subways as it is faster and more effective than cars. Even people who have cars started to use them in order to save time and money. As the subways work by electricity, they are a good way to save the environment. Consequently, governments should try to develop them more.
Second, developing public transportation is less expensive and more effective than improving roads. Even though roads can be used for trading, they need a huge amount of money to be improved. Governments can spend less money on trains which are used by more people in society. Furthermore, trains are a safer and faster way for commercial purposes as we have very developed trains that can be as fast as planes. For example, people in my country use trains most of the time for traveling. Due to trains and airplanes, the number of people using highroads is not worthing that the amount of money needed to be spent to improve highroads. Last week, I have read about an electrical train that is faster than airplanes. If governments invest more money in this field, we may have a new revolutionary way of transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | wty980711 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Orwell1984 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | marysv | 73 | view |
- should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to save the environment. Consequently, governments should try to develop them m...
^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... traveling. Due to trains and airplanes, the number of people using highroads is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96198830409 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02714060574 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5584936263 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1363636364 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42376649845 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128636506589 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127096808687 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301154590221 0.150856017488 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693840801031 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.