The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The bar chart compares the proportion of citizens going to the movie theaters on various days in a nation in Euro.
The most striking feature is that a majority of people preferred to watch films on Saturday and Sunday. In addition, the percentage of viewers going to the cinemas increased gradually every day during the time surveyed.
In 2003, the proportion of residents going to the movie houses on a Saturday was highest, accounted for 40%. The figures for Sunday and Friday were lower and the same, at 30%. During the next 4 years, the percentages of people watching films on a Saturday and Sunday climbed gradually to nearly 45% and above 30% respectively, whereas the figure for Friday remained constant.
Regarding the remaining days, 20% of people went to the movie theaters on a Tuesday, compared to more than 15% on a Wednesday, nearly 12% on a Thursday and 10% on a Monday. The period between 2003 and 2007 witnessed a marginal growth in the percentages of citizens in the movie theaters on a Monday and a Thursday to above 10% and nearly 15% respectively. In contrast, the figures for Tuesday and Wednesday felt gradually to under 20% and approximately 10% respectively in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | thanhtam2709 | 95 | view |
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 89
- The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 76
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on a Monday. The period between 2003 and 2007 witnessed a marginal growth in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84390243902 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79039740325 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0582242404 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139429061953 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586028469357 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447975941753 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922455594449 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367904246484 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.