The bar chart illustrates the number of social networking site that people in Canada use in the year 2014 and 2015.
Overall, most Canadian used at least one site of social network while about a fifth of people did not use any social network and majority of people tend to have only 1 - 2 sites.
In 2015, the figure shown that 22% of Canadian could not or did not access to social networking website and the number slightly decrease at 1% in 2015. However, having only one site was the highest in 2015, 36%, but there was a dramatic drop in the next year. It was followed by two site which had around 23 - 24 percent of people in 2014 and 2015. Three sites, four sites and five sites were not that flavor much by Canadian at 12%, 5% and 2% respectively, but it had a consider rise by every category in 2015. However, five sites were the minority option in both years.
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming richer and the poor are growing poorer. What are the causes of this? what measures can be taken to reduce this problem? 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'site' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sites'.
Suggestion: sites
...n the next year. It was followed by two site which had around 23 - 24 percent of peo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...12%, 5% and 2% respectively, but it had a consider rise by every category in 2015. However...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36809815951 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17883634624 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5887017484 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284590532722 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146070339497 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11374315754 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254180092332 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097635137087 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.