The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the change of air contamination levels in London, according to two main features smoke and Sulfur dioxide over 400 years period.
It is obvious that the amount of smoke and Sulfur dioxide saw a significant fluctuation. Additionally, sulfur dioxide in the air was always greater than smoke in the period given above
In terms of Smoke, initially, 1600 experienced a tiny amount of smoke releasing to the vibe, which was almost trivial. After that the figures increased dramatically every decades and reaching its peak of 400 micrograms per cubic meter in 1890. From 1890, in general, this figure considerably decreased during nearly 100 years, roughly 0 micrograms per cubic meter although some years it experienced a slight vary.
In 1580, about 200 micrograms per cubic meter of Sulfur dioxide released to the air, slightly higher compared to the smoke. There was an over 30 times increase in the amount of this chemical before witnessing a fluctuation from 1720 to 1890. The amount of Sulfur dioxide reached its peak at around 800 micrograms per cubic meter, then, the figure plummeted gradually until it reached a bottom of 0 in 2000.
- some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today\s life. others argue that the history is a valua source of information. do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in group while others believe that it is better for them to study on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 67
- not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. why? how to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 78
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n London, according to two main features smoke and Sulfur dioxide over 400 years ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0621761658 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69898954269 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9357550349 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0346650265582 0.215688989381 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0164784347501 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282218858013 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0288880243389 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338890365825 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.