The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009
The table illustrates the income of middle/high school teachers of the five different nation in term of starting salary, after 15 years, maximum and years taken to reach top salary in 2009.
An inspection of data in the table reveals that the wage of secondary/high school teachers from Luxembourg was highest while the income of teachers who taught at australia was lowest. On the other hand, the figures of year taken to reach top salary highest in Japan.
Out of five country, the starting income of middle/high school teacher was noticeable higher in Luxembourg, at 80,000 and the Denmark at 45000, compare to 28000 in australia. after 15 years working, the salaries of teachers from japan was approximate two-time that of starting, while in the Korea the income only increase 18000, at 48000. It can be seen that the maximum of salaries of secondary/ high school In Luxembourg was highest, peak at 132000, that higher than japan 46000 and was than two-time in Korea. But the teacher from australia only need 8 years taken to reach top income while in japan the number was 37 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | gulbakhyt_90 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | vivi.infp | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 67
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions 74
- The chart show the percentage of adult population with different categories in a city in 2003 and 2013 61
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened, kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...ry/high school teachers from Luxembourg was highest while the income of teachers who taught...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...t 45000, compare to 28000 in australia. after 15 years working, the salaries of teach...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86559139785 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53134472034 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489247311828 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2098297305 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267376512816 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139070958073 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850368220388 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22790254768 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481277725499 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.