The income of secondary school and high school teachers in 5 different nations is compared in the given table.
From an overall perspective, it is apparent that teachers from Luxembourg received the highest paid, while teachers in Australia had the lowest paid. Additionally, it took the shortest time for Denmark teachers to reach the maximum salaries.
In Luxembourg, teachers received wages starting at $80,000 and $119,000 for teachers who worked for 15 years. In addition, it took 30 years for them to reach the maximum income at $132,000. Meanwhile, Australian teachers received $28,000 for the first years, while the figure for that in Denmark was $45,000. It took 9 years for Australian and 8 years for Denmark teachers to have the highest income, which is $48,000 and $54,000 respectively.
Teachers from Japan had the starting paid at $34,000, which is $4,000 higher than that in Korea. After 15 years working, Japanese and Korean teachers were paid $65,000 and $48,000 correspondingly. To receive the maximum wage at $86,000, teachers in Japan must have at least 37 years experience. Additionally, the highest income for teachers in Korea is $62,000 a year, which took 34 years to earn.
- The chart compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 90
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 67
- The chart compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...had the starting paid at 4,000, which is ,000 higher than that in Korea. After 15 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69376761394 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.164792099 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125291637502 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07099941504 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777830447316 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13008518363 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104236502241 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.