The charts below give information about the way in which water used in different countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about water consumption in 3 purposes by different nations in 2000 are shown in the chart. The figures are given in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the world water were used mainly in argriculture and domestic was the least. Moreover, most given countries had a minority water comsumption for industrial purpose except Canada.
The marjor use of the world water comsumption is agricultural purpose which was accounted for 70% of total use. This proportion is as twice as much as other purposes which were domestic use and industry use with only 22% and 8% respectively.
Moving to the nations which their argriculture water comsumption level were more than a half, India’s economic wasmainly rely on argriculture resulting in 92% of water used was for agriculture which sum of domestic and industry water consumption was just under one-ten. Another countries in this group is China where 69% of water use was for agriculture. Agriculture water use in China was less than in India for almost a third, while consumption in industry ranked the second in China with 22% of total water usage.
Regarding the other countries where water consumption level in argriculture were not their majority purpose. First and foremost was Canada where their water was used mainly in industry with 80% of total and water used in agriculture was only 8% reversed to India and China. Lastly, the proportion of water used in agriculture and domestic in New Zealand were pretty equal which were 44% and 46% of total water consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-02 | pandaree.r | 67 | view |
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 34
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences.What extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Nowadays, most people try to balance between work and other part of lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance.What are the problems of this? Suggest some solutions to solve the problem? 67
- The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing.What are the reasons?What are the impacts? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, second, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8122158962 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462745098039 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4724030487 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219829864943 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1065062449 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681471748459 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160543796302 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395077005534 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.