We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than people whose views we contradict our own
The stated issue ponders on a very important assertion that there is a lot to learn from the like minded people than the people with the contradicting views. It is a very subjective issue where there can be many pros and cons however when looked into holistically, I shall agree with the stated assertion. The like minded views and contradicting views , many a times come into head on collision but they can also lead to some very authentic solutions if discussed in a congenial atmosphere.
There goes a famous saying " Birds of a feather , flock together". This implies that like minded people go a long way , be it their career, accomplishment of any common objective, overcoming a challenging task , great discoveries or the greatest of inventions. The like minded people form a consensus to move ahead whenever there comes a doubt in the mind of a compatriot. Like mindedness fosters unity, creates a spirit of harmony in achieving a particular task.
History is replete with examples that it is the like mindedness or the people who share the common views have achieved great feats in the field of science and technology
which have helped to propel these fields into the future. It was only the common view of both the Wright Brothers that the man can fly lead to the creation of present day planes which has led to great advancement in commuting from one place to another within a matter of few hours.
It is unfathomable to imagine great business ventures to have made an impact on this world without the like mindedness of the partners. The mammoth IT company like Infosys had not come into existence had it not been due to the like mindedness of the initial founding fathers. There were many pitfalls and initial hiccups during the fledgling phase , but the firm steps into the future was only possible due to the compatriots with common views that they have to move ahead overcoming all the difficulties.
The people with shared views fosters an intrepid spirit in all the compatriots. The first conquer of Mount Everest had not been feasible by the Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay if they had not supported and inspired each other during the time of numerous difficulties which came at every step while ascending the Mount Everest.
However, there can be many situations when a contradicting views is essential because the opposing theories helps to find lacunaes in any project or task. It should not always be the aim to " Kill the mockingird" because a dissenting opinion is very essential to achieve a more holistic solution. In a democratic government, the contradicting views is of significant importance as it can help to create a unity among the people only by listening and providing a solution to all the people in democracy.
At the end, it can be reasonably asserted that the people with a common mindset is quite essential in achieving a great feat as it helps to inspire each other during the time of insurmountable difficulties. However, we should not always negate the contradicting views as it may help to find a more holistic solution to the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-05 | Sushant5386 | 66 | view |
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 50
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than people whose views we contradict our own 66
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings. 66
- This is a very generalised statement that Government should put their entire resources in solving the immediate pressing needs of the country rather than the anticipated problems of the future. I agree to the fact that the government should focus on the u 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ike minded views and contradicting views , many a times come into head on collisio...
^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...ed views and contradicting views , many a times come into head on collision but they ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... famous saying ' Birds of a feather , flock together'. This implies that...
^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es that like minded people go a long way , be it their career, accomplishment of a...
^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...objective, overcoming a challenging task , great discoveries or the greatest of in...
^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in the field of science and technology which have helped to propel these fields...
^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...dedness of the partners. The mammoth IT company like Infosys had not come into existenc...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...itial hiccups during the fledgling phase , but the firm steps into the future was ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2592.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89056603774 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83726619881 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477358490566 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9281412719 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.421052632 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8947368421 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221068707606 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715993396672 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698553105144 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103617521048 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578586170871 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.