Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others.
Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer.
Students displaying disruptive behaviors tend to pose a challenge for their more studious peers as well as the teaching staff. While allocating them to different classrooms may provide some temporary relief to both groups, this may not be in the best interest of all students and society.
On one side, by placing disturbing students in the care of a separate teacher, the obedient students are less likely to be negatively affected by the disobedient ones. Hence, cases of bullying or of model students mirroring the pranks of their mischievous classmates would be less frequent. Moreover, teachers have the opportunity to tailor their teaching materials to the abilities and personalities of their classes. In turn, this is more likely to contribute to an effective and efficient learning process for both types of students.
However, by implementing class streaming, schools may be impeding the social skills of their students. Indeed children should learn to cope with the tumultuous traits of others since they are likely to face similar situations as adults.
Furthermore, labeling children as ‘bad’ from a young age may inflict a social stigma which may be hard to discard as they grow up. This may explain why certain schools are infamous for churning out criminals and unproductive workers despite their attempts at employing the most qualified teachers or enrolling well-behaved students. In a sense, the process of grouping students tends to perpetuate inequalities within our society as, over time, students unwillingly conform to the reputation bestowed upon them by adults. In the long run, this system fails to draw the best out of people, especially those considered to be noisy and disobedient.
To conclude, class streaming may not be the best approach to deal with naughty students. Instead, attempts should be made at understanding the circumstances which initially triggered these unpleasant behaviors. Thus, by tackling the problem at its roots, the most ideal outcome can be achieved for all parties involved.
- Do you agree with the following statement? Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child’s success in life. 61
- Should a city preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings 86
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? 92
- Fashion trends are difficult to follow these days and it’s widely believed that they primarily exist to sell clothes. Some people believe that we shouldn’t follow them and that we should dress in what we like and feel comfortable in. To what extent do you 65
- An English speaking friend wants to spend a two week holiday in your region and has written asking for information and advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter offer to find somewhere to stay give advice about what to do give information about 75
Sentence: In the long run, this system fails to draw the best out of people, especially those considered to be noisy and disobedient.
Description: The fragment those considered to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace considered with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.716 7.5
It is on top list:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/ielts
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1673 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.212 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.851 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.716 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.321 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.583 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5