The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008.
The bar charts compare the proportion of population at the aged of 23 to 65 in different jobs in Ashby in the UK with the average percentage in the UK as a whole in 2008.
Overall, people in the Ashby did all types of work popular in the UK at that time. Another interesting point is that while the number of people did technical work made the least proportion in the Ashby, this figure in the UK as a whole just stood behind office work which was the most popular in 2008.
Looking at details, in 2008, the percentage of people earning living by office work contributed the highest part in the UK and ranked the second place in Ashby, at 19% and 18% in turn. There was a remarkable gap between the number of people did personal service in Ashby which reach the first place with 21% compared to 9% for technical work, meanwhile, this figures for those jobs are the same in the UK, at 17%.
Similarly, in Ashby, 14% population did shop work which was nearly twice as higher as this figure for professional work, at 8%, while there was no significant change in the number of people who did this two works in the UK, at 13% and 14% respectively. However, both in Ashby and the UK all had the same proportion of people who was unemployed and did construction work, remained at around 15% and at 10% in turn.
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- : Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage? 84
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage households with c in one European country between 1971 and 2001 76
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008. 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36475409836 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43279392757 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463114754098 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.943454342 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.142857143 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8571428571 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229957067678 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149312525559 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12650745409 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204060458633 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14493373989 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.6 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.