The given bar chart compare and contrast the data on the differences in the number of minutes per person who did household chores per day by the sex of Great Britain.
Overall, it is clearly seen from the chart that the number of men who spent time for gardening and taking care of pet was the highest, while cooking, baking and washing up were the most popular household chores for women.
Clearly, the amount of time each day of men is higher than that of women who took part in some activities including gardening, pet care and maintenance odd jobs. To specify, there were 49.5 minutes of males who used the time for gardening and petcare per day, whereas few women did so, at 21 minutes. It is also noticeable that men spent time for maintenance odd jobs account for 26 minutes per day, which was approximately triple as high as the figure of women participating in this work.
Nevertheless, women surpassed men by the number of minutes per day when it comes to the rest of the categories. In detail, it took 74 minutes for women cooking, baking and washing up per day, whereas only 30 minutes for men. Moreover, it is easy to see that the amount of time which women used for clothes, washing, ironing, sewing, tidying and cleaning house was more than many times man did on this activities, respectively more than 13 and 4 times.
- The charts below show information about animals and rainfall at the Nboro Nature Reserve Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basic and a large number of children play computer games What are the positive and negative effects of playing computer games 89
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 61
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming richer and the poor are growing poorer. What are the causes of this? what measures can be taken to reduce this problem? 73
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with younger people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...use was more than many times man did on this activities, respectively more than 13 a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57083333333 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46770459582 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6171163706 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.125 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871185748268 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459694570236 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401947844191 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729721467969 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346564895478 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.