People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Our reactions often give way to understanding our behaviour and it is said that our reactions reflect who we are. But it is possible even if the decisions are ours, the circumstances facilitating these decisions and resultant behaviours are not controlled by us.
Human behaviour is conditioned by myriad factors. Some behaviours are evolutionary and develop over a period of time like survival of the fittest while some instantaneous and are biological like fight and flight. Human behaviour is largely conditioned by his or her social environment and the interactions he/ she has with it. For example, the collective behaviour of voters in an election. Now, these behaviours even if controlled by an individual on the fundamental level, the collective, resultant behaviour is engendered through the prevailing social and political conditions.
In all the above cases, it can be argued that behaviours exhibited were an outcome of rational nature of human beings. However, many studies like ones by Daniel Khanman and Amos Tversky show that rationality and instincts work together to nuture a persons behaviour and decisions both at individual and collective levels. Elaborating the previous example of elections, one can see the trend of right-wing leaders getting elected to power across the globe. Now, these sentiments are not always present and can be manufactured through economical, social and political forces. It is pretty much the same way any advertising campaign works, compelling buyers to change their mind and buy the product.
In the end, the decisions at the microlevel could be at times be controlled by an individual but the circumstances prevaileing the decisons and the conditioning of the individual are outside the individual’s ambit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | AC1990 | 54 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | stevewang1007 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Navjot-kaur | 54 | view |
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 16
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villag 63
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement."Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs 85
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...urs are evolutionary and develop over a period of time like survival of the fittest while some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amental level, the collective, resultant behaviour is engendered through the prev...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...and instincts work together to nuture a persons behaviour and decisions both at individ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42391304348 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18115735697 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8774322694 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0208316168578 0.243740707755 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00926020027403 0.0831039109588 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0153056205382 0.0758088955206 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0105480404527 0.150359130593 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138244590689 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.