The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Assuring road safety proves to be of great necessity in elevating traffic security. The idea that only through rigorous penalty can traffic safety be advanced. In my opinion, while I accept this point of view is beneficial, I would argue that there are more solutions than just implementing harsh punishments on driving misdemeanors.
On the one hand, there are justified reasons from those who support heavy sentences to reform traffic well-being. Firstly, the government dispel any ideas of the same repetitive outrages. Therefore, penalties are imposed which contribute to enhance understanding for traffic attendants: increasing the amount of fine, driving license suspension and even imprisonment. Additionally, people are stimulated to obey the law willingly when severe punishments are enforced. For instance, when one gets punished heavily, he or she will instantly be more careful by paying more attention while driving or slowing down to notice pedestrians crossing. Thus, new drivers especially the young who manage to learn before attending the troublous congestion are challenged to comply.
On the other hand, there are some remedies served for decreasing dangers on the road which is not only by imposing heavy penalties. Initially, public transport should reasonably decrease prices for everyone, mainly for students and senior citizens. Hopefully, traveling by buses or trains, which aim to be sufficient accords in both developed and developing nations, may be a contributor to diminish traffic jam and air contamination. Besides, young new traffic attendants are encouraged to be educated before they are ready to meet the flow of vehicles. For example, "Joy riding" is arisen when someone steals cars and drives them without particular goals, but just the pleasure or trembling of doing so, owing to the popularity among untaught individuals before driving. Hence, everyone should be well-informed about traffic laws so as to minimize offences on the road.
In conclusion, leveling fine status is not the only answer to improve road safety as there are numerous different approaches to tackle the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us congestion are challenged to comply. On the other hand, there are some remedi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 843, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uld be well-informed about traffic laws so as to minimize offences on the road. In ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 883, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so as to minimize offences on the road. In conclusion, leveling fine status is n...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...wer to improve road safety as there are numerous different approaches to tackle the issue.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55351681957 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94166395545 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65749235474 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1367284776 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120393367604 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039520586716 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400548668996 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917507947041 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423317039828 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.