Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems have caused a major concern over the last few decades, and a variety of solutions is being proposed in order to tackle them. Some people suggest that the solution is to raise the prices of fuel for cars and other means of transportation. I think, this will not help to improve the situation, as it will probably help to deal with air pollution only, but not other issues, like water pollution or ozone depletion.
One of the reasons why I disagree with this view is that the transportation system or cars that we tend to use on a daily basis is not the only source of air pollution. Factories and even households all around the world are seemed to produce more carbon dioxide than cars. Countries, like China and the USA contribute to the largest proportion of greenhouse gas emissions, and this does not include cars.
Moreover, air pollution is not the only problem threatening the environment. Take water pollution or ozone layer depletion as an example. Millions of tonnes of toxic waste is dumped into oceans and hundreds of rocket launches are carried out annually, which harm already fragile ecosystem. These issues have nothing to do with cars, and high cost of fuel cannot solve them.
On the other hand, there are some people who argue that this measure is likely to succeed. They hold the view that providing people use their cars or other types of transport less than they do today, environmental problems will be solved, as cars are responsible for air pollution to some extent.
To conclude, even though using cars is one of the contributors of air pollution, and raising the cost of fuel is likely to solve the issue, I argue that this solution is not convincing enough to solve all the problems of the environment.
- Social media has replaced the traditional methods of communicating, and people use more and more social media to communicate, to follow news and events. Do the advantages of social outweigh its disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 52
- The graph below shows information about the number of tourists visited different parts of the world. 73
- Today family members eat fewer meals together Why is this Is this a positive or negative trend 81
- Some people believe that robots are important for humans to develop future, while others think it is dangerous invention that will impact society negatively. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63577790007 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542763157895 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9094799416 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278294467178 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917655322979 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847414251648 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155428192701 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073262158771 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.