Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author believes that we should only save those species which are on the verge of extinction only if they are at this stage because of human activities. I generally disagree to this policy and would substantiate my views in the following essay which will elaborate my reasons of disagreement.
Human is the only animal on this planet who has been given power to think and act, rest all are in a way helpless creatures who follow a specific course of action as their genetic material commands. If we are able to help a creature to preclude from extinction why shall we take a back seat. If you have a resource and the power to use that extremely powerful resource then why not use it for a good cause. Till date humans have exploited earth's myriad resources from non-living to living things, now is the payback time.
Also, we also need to consider that if we only save those who are at a verge of extinction due to human activities, then there might be a case that some species are on the verge of extinction who are an extremely important part of the food chain but they are not endangered due to human activities. For example- due to some natural calamity, if insects eating dead remains becomes endangered, we need to quickly take action on it and try to preclude the extinction. It is because if they becomes extinct the repercussions would be catastrophic. The dead remains will become pervasive and as no one would be there to consume it, it will pile up and bring widespread diseases, which might end up taking lives of several human beings.
We also need to consider the fact that we live in a symbiosis world where we all are like a one big family. We are social creatures. we are dependent on several species and several species are dependent on us. It is this relation that has maintained the life still sustainable on this planet. Imagine if we just ignore a species who we are dependent and let them die off just because we are not the reason for their misery. This reasoning is both illogical and hideous.
Though we must ponder about it before taking any action. there might be some distant species who are naturally dying off or say evolving and its previous generation is dying off, then we cannot come in between their metamorphosis process. Also we need to think about various other factors like there are many other very crucial issues prevalent before humans that need exigent attention. So, we need to choose wisely; how much resources we can spend on it currently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors."Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat produc 12
- The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the general manager of KNOW radio station."Several factors indicate that radio station KNOW should shift its programming from rock-and-roll music to a continuous news format. Consider, for example, that the 33
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fisherman into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...e the extinction. It is because if they becomes extinct the repercussions would be cata...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...ne big family. We are social creatures. we are dependent on several species and se...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oning is both illogical and hideous. Though we must ponder about it before taking a...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...nder about it before taking any action. there might be some distant species who are n...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...in between their metamorphosis process. Also we need to think about various other fa...
^^^^
Line 9, column 423, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...tion. So, we need to choose wisely; how much resources we can spend on it currently....
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ources we can spend on it currently.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6509009009 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54174125833 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497747747748 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0792034421 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172535239768 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541318798375 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061574350458 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113189207995 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739586477316 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.