With a growing population many people believe that we should focus on more GM foods What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this

Essay topics:

With a growing population, many people believe that we should focus on more GM foods.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this?

The scarcity of food supply is becoming apparent, so some genetics scientists suggest solving this problem with altered DNA. This essay will consider the benefits and drawbacks of this kind of food.

Let us begin with merits of food with modified genetic structure. The first advantage is that it is resistant to both illnesses and pesticides. Many vegetables and fruits perish in large numbers because of various diseases as well as unwanted insects, but genetically altered crops are immune to many infections and have an unattractive smell for pesticides. Another benefit is that It is relatively more fruitful. Crops with modified genes can grow faster and bigger than traditional ones, so more people can feed on them. Furthermore, It can thrive in dry areas. Due to its ability to consume on small amounts of water, this kind of vegetation can flourish, for example, either in desserts or in mountains.

Despite the above mentioned benefits, genetically modified food has many drawbacks. First of all, it may cause some serious disorders. Food with generic modification has allegedly resulted in a few cases of cancer, but health care organization has not acknowledged these incidents. Secondly, altered crops has some negative effects on the ecosystem. When it penetrates into the soil as a result of waste, it usually poisons trees and small animals. Finally, it is hardly possible to find traditional food in large markets. Genetically modified food is prevailing in the market thanks to its low price and making the sale of conventional food unprofitable; therefore, if one wants to buy unaltered vegetables, they have to address private gardeners.

In conclusion, genetically altered food has both positive and negative sides.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (22 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-02 drmona.914 56 view
Essays by user Tolik :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30685920578 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88389135726 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617328519856 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2746936731 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4705882353 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118285540197 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366076767071 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370023135667 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664035034511 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577669832807 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.