The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organisation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Owing to the profound growth in communication and relationship between multinational institutions' staff and local individuals, it is now believed that multinational organizations play a vital role in the understanding of other cultures. In response to this, I am absolutely convinced that this is correct, and will therefore examine my views in this essay.
One of the reasons why I believe multinational organisations aid the understanding of other culture is due to the communication that occurs between their staff and the public. Usually, constant communication among different individuals changes perspectives about their tradition and belief. This is because as people of different races interact, they tend to have clearer view of their culture. For example, majority of the reporters of the British Broadcasting Corporation have in-depth knowledge of African cultures. Evidently, the continual communication with the local people facilitated the knowledge.
Another relevant way multinational organisation facilitates the understanding of other culture is through relationship. Establishing relationship with the public enhances promotion of products and services which is an essential part of most organizations. For instance the British American Tobacco, in order to increase its sales, usually study the behaviour of the people in the environment by relating with them. As a result of this, they tend to acquire more knowledge of the culture of the local people, hence, the understanding.
In conclusion, not only does multinational organisation aid communication amongst different people of diverse cultures, but it also strengthens relationship through marketing. Therefore, I completely believe that working for multinational organisation is the best way to understand other culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-21 | Yasharm | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | adeagboridwan | 72 | view |
- Today, most people get married and give birth in their thirties rather than when they are youngerIs it a positive or negative development?To what extent do you support this development? 78
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past.Why is this the case?Is it a positive or negative development ? 67
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subject. Others think that, in today's world, subjects like science and technology are more important than historyDiscuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Today most people get married and give birth in their thirties rather than when they were younger Is it a positive or negative development in your own opinion To what extent do you support this development 66
- Boxing is a blood sport which often results in physical injury It is inappropriate for this sport to exist in the modern age Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97307692308 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53368197268 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0413975689 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189658548263 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750159067013 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103013571477 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127417850717 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551221042913 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.