Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an issue about finding extraterrestrial creatures. Some astronomers argue that humans should repeatedly emit signals into cosmos, while others state that these pulses may bring trouble on people. This essay disagrees with the idea of establishing connection with aliens.
Let us start with reasons why some cosmos explorers claim that they should cast signals into out space to establish connection with other forms of life. The first reason is that it allows people and aliens to exchange knowledge about technology. Scientists can learn a great deal of information about, for example, high-speed shuttles to travel between planets. Another reasons is that space scientists can ask about the emergence of the universe. There are many questions about how both stars and planets appear, but, with the help of extraterrestrial forms of life, humans can finally find the answer. Furthermore, scientists can invite them to the Earth. To ask other questions personally and see how aliens look, astronomers will ask them to visit the Earth.
However, some astronomers think that this endeavor with space signals may turn life-threatening. Firstly, aliens will want to conquer the Earth. Space scientists may put mankind at risk of become enslaved, if aliens are hostile to terrestrial inhabitants. Secondly, they may introduce deadly diseases. Extraterrestrial creatures are likely to infect people with incurable and highly contagious microbes, which will perish in a short period. Moreover, nations can destroy each other with new extraterrestrial weapons. Countries may attack each other with new type of firearm, such as powerful lasers, as soon as aliens shares their military technology.
In conclusion, although many space explorers advocate the idea of establishing communication with creatures on other planets, I believe that it can be a rush decision, which may destroy living beings on the Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | anmol.anubha | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | Tolik | 78 | view |
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.What problems does it cause?What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 78
- Are romantic movies damaging to real relationship 86
- Nowadays people have adopted an unhealthy lifestyle Why do think this is How could this problem be solved 20
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letterintroduce yourselfdescribe your plans for the partyinvite your neighbour to com 73
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development.Discuss both points and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...travel between planets. Another reasons is that space scientists can ask about the...
^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arm, such as powerful lasers, as soon as aliens shares their military technology....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51186440678 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95474630231 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583050847458 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6550733833 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182495665947 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544209111056 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431990373308 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112466530386 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328189971073 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.