Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general
Recently, the phenomenon of new technological development in the recent years is a boon and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that curse for the society in general can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, all technological development in the annual is a boon can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, in society in the recently years new technology has boon might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of any new technological development in the society in general is boon far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
2019-07-20 | edsonsimoes | 61 | view |
2019-07-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
2019-07-17 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Life experience is a better teacher than school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion. 88
- People emphasizing goverment to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicle the are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss or not discuss? 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss or not discuss? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60223048327 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32980931541 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620817843866 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2494207672 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37214049577 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117369834368 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13513459349 0.071462118173 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20440834262 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717787153847 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.