Some people think that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and the government and big companies can make a difference. To what extent you agree or disagree?
It is argued that individuals cannot do anything to improve the environment, and only the government and big companies can make a difference. However, I disagree with this idea.
One of the main reasons why individuals can improve the environment is that individuals can reduce the amount of rubbish. When people consciously reduce the output of waste in daily life, a quantity of rubbish will be decreased, and the contaminant will be reduced effectively. For example, if citizens improve their awareness of environmental protection by not using plastic bags when they go shopping, the White Pollution will not be so serious as now.
Another is that individuals’ behavior can conserve natural resources. Human beings need plenty of resources to survive, such as water, electricity, light and so on. Provided that people start to utilize resources rationally, the energy crisis will be eased. A good case in point is that people can turn off the lights when they leave, in order to save the the electrical energy.
Admittedly, a few people may think that only the government and big companies can make a contribution to protect the environment. Government can draw up and enact harsh laws to force companies to advance their production devices as most of pollution is caused by old machines. On the other hand, big companies can set a good example for other companies.
To summarize, there is no doubt that government and big companies’ efforts can improve the environment. However, I still believe that the people are making greater contributions to improve the environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-09 | ThuBella | 89 | view |
2019-06-17 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
2019-06-17 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
2019-06-17 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- In many countries, the elderly proportion of the population is increasing steadily. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 56
- it is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reverse the trend? 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 14
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ights when they leave, in order to save the the electrical energy. Admittedly, a few...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ights when they leave, in order to save the the electrical energy. Admittedly, a few...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, for example, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22568093385 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08868546395 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571984435798 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7631094845 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423342298141 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153448791424 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133342634127 0.0667982634062 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263638592998 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119182067656 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.