The bar graph shows the number of car journeys into the city per day from 1996 to 2005.
The chart elucidates the number of journeys with car into the city center by residents and non-residents over ten years period. The x-axis shows the years separated from 1996 to 2005. The y-axis quantifies the number of journey per day.
In 1996 an average of just under 10.000 people per day were being made by governments, while approximately half that umber were made by non-governments. Over the subsequent four years, people journey remained reasonably stable , while non-people journeys increased each year, exceeding 8.000 per day in 1999. In early 2000, parking meters were introduced into the city center, and this had the effect virtually halving resident traffic, although non resident traffic decreased only slightly.
By the end of 2002, the number of resident journeys had not significantly, but non resident journeys had risen to their 1999 level. At this point, Flamboyan street and Park Lane were pedestrianised. This resulted in a dramatic decline in non-resident traffic, and a slight decrease in resident traffic.
From this point onwords, resident traffic remained more or less at the same level, while non resident traffic resumed it is upward trend, reaching nearly 5.000 journeys per day in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-17 | Azwar Fadillah Zulham | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-17 | Azwar Fadillah Zulham | 46 | view |
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in hydroelectric power station 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. 73
- The bar graph shows the number of car journeys into the city per day from 1996 to 2005 46
- The advertisement of alcohol in media or public is forbidden to do it. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The bar graph shows the number of car journeys into the city per day from 1996 to 2005 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eople journey remained reasonably stable , while non-people journeys increased eac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4025974026 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8377857734 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681818181818 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7830853197 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0105647720741 0.215688989381 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0062497429734 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0100542180559 0.0843802449381 12% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0090478316007 0.15604864568 6% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.000532881584459 0.0819641961636 1% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.