The government should make people take responsibility for their actions to the environment. To what extent do you agree?
Many responsibilities people should take towards the environment, but this cannot happen if the government didn't do any step. People think that actions must take from them first, and others disagree and believe that government should take this responsibility.
On one hand, some people agree that people should take responsibility for their actions to the environment. First, oblige people must oblige themselves to start recycling from home, and learn how to no throw their wastes randomly on the roads or out from their cars. Second, they must encourage themselves to buy hybrid or electric cars, which are eco-friendly and won't harm the environment and decrease air pollution. Moreover, people must obey the rules and respect them, to avoid fines if they try to pollute the environment, by burning or cutting trees and polluting water, such as factories disposing their chemicals in the sea water or rivers. For example, in my country people don't respect their environment and throw their garbage's without recycling, plus the government don't take any actions. In my opinion I disagree, the government should take strict actions on every person is not respecting the environment and impose extra fines on them.
On the other hand, several people think the opposite, and believe that the government should take responsibility before forcing people to take any actions. First, to encourage people to use eco-friendly things, the government must decrease or remove tariff fees on these items, like electric cars and solar system. Second, the government should improve road sector, give the priority to the bicycles instead of cars and create a lane for them. Moreover, they should ban plastic in all homes, restaurants and stores and oblige people to stop using it. However, the government must increase its awareness campaigns about pollution side effect and causes. For example, the Ministry of Environment in Lebanon, lately imposed fines on everyone try to throw garbage on the road or outside the car, and the process began, and people started respecting this rule. From my side I agree and believe that the government should force itself by rules on its people and take the full responsibility.
In conclusion, some people think that people must take responsibility for their actions towards the environment, others believe this is the government role. In my opinion, the government should force its regulation on people and oblige them to follow and respect their environments.
- Many people are choosing finding information online rather than in books Is this development positive or negative 77
- The world is consuming natural resources faster than they can be renewed Therefore it is important that products are made to last Governments should discourage people from constantly buying more up to date or fashionable products To what extent do you agr 89
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts, and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extant do you agree with this view? 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think money spent in developing technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ut this cannot happen if the government didnt do any step. People think that actions ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 685, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...vers. For example, in my country people dont respect their environment and throw the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 780, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... without recycling, plus the government dont take any actions. In my opinion I disag...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29974811083 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75914433062 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460957178841 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0944755888 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.764705882 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413119022582 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169198336537 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129818434305 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319623635454 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422466448476 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.