The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph illustrates the energy consumption of fuel in USA between the history in 1980 and the projections in 2030.
It can be clearly seen that there are six lines in the graph. Overall, the trends of various lines are usually increasing.
Petrol and Oil was being the leader at 35 quadrillion units as well as transcended 45 quadrillion units over fifty years. At 2030, 30 quadrillion units of Coal will become the second-high resource by fuel, while it was just 15 quadrillion units at the beginning. Also, the increase of natural gas was kept gradually from 16 quadrillion units to 24 quadrillion units over the period.
The starting points of nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower was same at 4 quadrillion units in 1980, although the energy waste of nuclear rose by 3 quadrillion units after 50 years. Moreover, solar or wind was next to nuclear as well as 6 quadrillion units was consumed at 2030. Finally, hydropower was the special one that remained unchanged at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | cocococo123 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australia men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these effected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compar 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83529411765 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78691952077 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5706741429 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952713570751 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569519070308 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980732698233 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106655733227 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12880280656 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.