Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.to what extent do you agree with this view?
The rigorous investment from government is important to determine the direction for the country developing. someone claims that the budget for arts promoting should be taken and invested on others. I absolutely agree with this statement and I will express my views.
To begin with, the result of arts investing is not effective. Nowadays, there are several entertainments for us, such as telephone’s application, the number of arts lover is less than the past due to the abundant life. Therefore, even if the government desires to promote arts, to develop culture, it is not helpful since people are not interested in this boring activity. So, government should spend money on the popular interest carefully. For instance, as far as someone tends to own a hobby on doing exercise in fitting room, government should encourage more people to participate this activity, like free the entrance price of it, to prompt a healthy atmosphere. As a result, arts should not be the superior and government may follow the public’s interest to choose an appropriate investment.
Likewise, arts investing is not practical. As soon as the official aims to enhance local culture, the social need should be concerned first. When people search for a job, which would not require the professional knowledge of arts. In contrast, all companies hope the worker to own practical knowledge, like the engineering skills or the first-aid certificate. Hence, the professional skills of the public should be care first before developing arts culture. Otherwise, people may find a work difficult.
In conclusion, since arts is not the compulsory part for social life, I strongly reckon that government should concern the public need rather than the arts culture developing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Molor-Od | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | poomoak | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | olimilove | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | lucastang00 | 61 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 56
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Someone
...e direction for the country developing. someone claims that the budget for arts promoti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cared'?
Suggestion: cared
...essional skills of the public should be care first before developing arts culture. O...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28928571429 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97367488925 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3646745533 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5625 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197173510885 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657840489722 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393666069314 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115785167917 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511594283662 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.