AN ENTERTAINER
Entertainment has become the most attractive issue for nowadays, moreover with the increase of social media users. It turns up the people mindset for paying more attention in entertainment world as a main profession. The people knew that being an entertainer such as an actress, singer, athlete etc, could rise their famous undoubtedly. They would be paid spectacular after giving their performance in tv, theatre, and another social media. Some people who expected more about entertainer arguing in a positive reason. They thought an entertainer always bring a good strategy to attract the audience. They often share an inspiring act trough a humanity shows.
However, several people have the opposite opinion. They often criticised about the payment’s entertainer and did not deserve to receive as higher as them. Their highlight point is an entertainer just played unwhorted role and rarely implemented some beneficial instead provided a detrimental things. At this moment entertainment more displayed a hedonic side, toxic love story, and any hostility.
In my point of view, I agree to the people who claimed that entertainer are no need to pay higher on their job. That kind of profession was digging profit in a selfish way as attempt to be a self centre. They seem like less empathy. The job that should be paid higher is a kind of humanity profession, which was activating something valuable to each other, such as teacher, a nurse, a cure, and even baby sitters are more deserve to get highly payment and respect than a pop musicians.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-31 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
2023-08-15 | viviannguyen | 78 | view |
2023-06-22 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
2022-05-17 | huathihongvan | 95 | view |
2021-08-12 | MONKEY | 56 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outwieigh the disadvantages? 78
- During last twenty years, the asssessment of students has undergone a major transformation. Many educational institutions have shifted their focus from traditional examination towards a variety of innovative assessment techniques, as they believe examinat 61
- The two tables show the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum before and after refurbishment. 78
- the prediction of total population in india and china in 2000 to 2050 78
- CELEBRITY 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...nd did not deserve to receive as higher as them. Their highlight point is an enter...
^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
...neficial instead provided a detrimental things. At this moment entertainment more disp...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a selfish way" with adverb for "selfish"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t kind of profession was digging profit in a selfish way as attempt to be a self centre. They se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'musician'?
Suggestion: musician
...t highly payment and respect than a pop musicians.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13385826772 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83935523031 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649606299213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0947383467 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9333333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375071203616 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122237498308 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117020178811 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248930552736 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149948914201 0.056905535591 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.