British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to english in 2000 and 2010
The pie chart compares amount of British students at one university in England along one decade specifically in 2000 and 2010 who were able to speak other languages in addition to english. There were 6 language skills category will be figured out and measurable in percentage. Overall, there were 3 language skills category which similarly increased whilst in contrast, the most declined trend happened to be in no other language mastered trend.
Regarding to the data, initially in 2000, the highest trend had to be in population of people who mastered spanish as addition language which stood at 30% while the second highest happened to be count in a group of people who didn’t have other languages skill at 20%. Then it followed by french as the additional language marked at 15% which similar with a batch of people who mastered in another foreign language. Furthermore, population of people who skilled in german as additional foreign language was standing at 10% which totally same as population of people who possess two other languages.
In the end of decade which in 2010, there were 3 language skills category that went up to 5% specifically marked on people who skilled in spanish, another foreign language and two other language trend. Contrastingly, the most declined trend happened to be in no other language skilled population which got down to 10%. Then the second decreased language skill was in french language user group which went down to 5%. Besides the population of german language skilled was the only category that maintain the same level respectively.
- Some people believe that children leisure activities must be educational; otherwise they are complete waste of time 73
- The percentage male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 84
- Before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- Average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, between 1967 to 2007 73
- young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...up of people who didn't have other languages skill at 20%. Then it followed by frenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'trend' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'trends'.
Suggestion: trends
...foreign language and two other language trend. Contrastingly, the most declined trend...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, regarding, second, similarly, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.15609756098 507% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08812260536 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71517512897 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455938697318 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8691934226 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.8 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387196448207 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181605081252 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193714789723 0.0843802449381 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300475235606 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158646174834 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.