The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments’ expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a fact that reconstruction old buildings have to spend plenty of public funding from the national treasury. Therefore, some people think that governments should spend that money to build a new house and improve the road. Personally, I disagree with this idea.
On the one hand, the first reason for this is because of causing pressure for taxpayers. If the government does not rebuild some old building, they do not need to collect money from their residents. For example, people have to pay lots of money for tax for other problems in their life and for public finance. Therefore, if governments do not reconstruct some old building, they will not consume public funding.
In spite of these ideas, I believe that the value of time-honored buildings in reflecting cultural identity is significant which cannot measure by money. For example, some old buildings had to build in a long time ago and restore the value of old manufacturing. Therefore, old buildings show the history of their own country. Finally, governments should remain old buildings which is of great economic value. For example, attracting plenty of people who live far away and foreigners, they often want to explore and learn about different cultures. This makes some old building become one of the most tourist destinations. It creates lots of jobs for unemployed and much-increasing economics in some local areas.
To sum up, while some people think that the government should use the money to develop a new house and road than using public funding for renovation old constructions.
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that giving longer prison sentences is the best way to reduce crime. Others believe that there are better ways to reduce crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- the diagram shows the process of making soft cheese. 56
- Most artists earn low salaries and should, therefore, receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08914728682 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82478375828 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538759689922 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2742415351 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236222450148 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938747285182 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708391989715 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176255314332 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553724070519 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.