The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
From the chart, we can see the percentage of people in the UK who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables daily has increased from 2001 to 2008. The chart divides the British population into three categories, men, women and children. More specifically, the year 2006 saw the highest percentage for women, more than 30% of whom ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day, but the number started to decrease thereafter.
Besides, no matter in which year, women were the group who ate most fruits and vegetables and children as the least. It is worthy to mention that the year 2004 saw a great rise after three-year stability both for men and children. However, the percentage never reached 30% for men and children, which proves the differences between men and women in lifestyles.
Another point needed to notice is that the percentages of all the three groups dropped in the year 2008.
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 89
- Chart summarizing. 11
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 84
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 652.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79411764706 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52119046962 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610294117647 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 185.4 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5870331449 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317348090305 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162427310065 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156483054263 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213624033336 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188004486203 0.0819641961636 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.