The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions Where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions Where relevant

The graph illustrates the differ in three sources of air pollutants in the UK between 1990 and 2005. Units are measured in million tonnes

There was a steadily downward trend in the total amount of air pollutants. In particular, the most significant fall was from industrial pollutants.

In 1990, the total amount of air pollutants was 7 million tonnes, then there was a steeply decrease to about 4 million tonnes in 1999. After which, the total amount of air pollutants went down steadily to 3 million tonnes in 2005.

Industry accounted for the highest contributed in air pollutants in the period of 1990 to 2005 compare to the other 2 sources of pollutants. In 1990, industrial pollutants was about 5.5 million tonnes, whilst the amount of pollutant accounted by either transport or household was only around 1 million tonnes. Over the year, air pollutants from industry experienced a sharply fall to 3 million tonnes in 1999 and finally 2 million tonnes in 2005. Contrast to which, pollutants from transport remain stable around 1 million tonnes, and pollutants from households dropped dramatically to just under 0.5 million tonnes.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-14 JennieD 73 view
2019-07-02 elteembored 67 view
2019-03-29 thuyduong896 73 view
2019-01-09 phuong cao 89 view
2018-12-10 goodtime 67 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The graph illustrates the differ in three sources of air pollutants in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...en 1990 and 2005. Units are measured in million tonnes There was a steadily downward...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steeply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ts was 7 million tonnes, then there was a steeply decrease to about 4 million tonnes in 1999. Afte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...ir pollutants from industry experienced a sharply fall to 3 million tonnes in 1999 and finally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, then, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13903743316 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81442991684 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465240641711 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.030450994 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200051318823 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119374356015 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966657115629 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154011704425 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900223624084 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.