The graph show the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010
The line graph compares the difference between three capital cities in terms of international conferences hosted over the course of 30 years, from 1980 to 2010
Overall, it is noticable that there was a sharp rose in the number of international conferences hosted by city C, whilst there was a moderate fall in two other city
In 1980, the figures for city A and city B was at 35 and 30, respectively. Despite similar fluctuation in the following year, booth cities number of conferences hosted were overall decrease to 27 conferences in 2005. Until 2010, the figures for city A dropped slightly to 24, being overtaken by city B with the figures of 26.
On the contrary, city C held no conferences in 1980, but then the number went up dramatically to 20 conferences in 1990 and kept rising steadily to 35 by 2000. By the end of the period, it had slightly decrease to 32 conferences, though still higher than the other two cities
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-25 | Lincoln | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | JennieD | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | thuyduong896 | 78 | view |
- The graph show the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010 67
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions Where relevant 67
- The graph show the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
... the end of the period, it had slightly decrease to 32 conferences, though still higher ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69090909091 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83585854089 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.210790843 43.030603864 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.8 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35055269265 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160909343745 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108018726569 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224145296857 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100296843048 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.