The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010
The given table illustrates the change in donations from three groups of healthy nations for fund of technology of unhealthy ones between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, the total amount of fundraising money was nearly doubled over the period shown. Interestingly, the US was recorded as the biggest donator in all time with the spending being many time higher than others’.
In 2006, the US donated $9.7billion to sponsor technology in developing nations, compared to just 3.3 and 2.7 billion dollar from EU and other countries, respectively. The year 2008 witnessed a remarkable increase in the America’s funding, reaching 13.5 billion dollar while there were no significant changes from EU and other countries.
Over the period of 5 years, US kept a continuous and considerable raise in giving aid to developing nations to end the year 2010 at 22.7 billion dollar, being account for more than two-third of total funding. In contrast, EU and other countries experienced slight fluctuations in their sponsorships with ending amount were 4.2 for the former and 3.7 billion dollar for the later.
Regarding to total expenditures received by poor nations, the figure for 2006 was 15.2 billion dollar and it was approximately twice time as at the period ended.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | oxfordpro111 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | JennieD | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- Sicentific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or dissagree? 89
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 61
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly. The year 2008 witnessed a remarkable increase in the America's funding, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26108374384 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91949128239 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600985221675 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0454232837 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277231758135 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115292071505 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695743228899 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135028005297 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674019101058 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.