The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The graph provided illustrates the data about the technological aid by three donor countries (America, European Union and other nations) for the third world nations between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, in a glance, it is evident that the main donor of technology sector development in underdeveloped countries was the United States of America. Also, in 2010 the US provided the largest sum of support.
Donating of about 9.7 billion dollars in 2001 and increasing by 0.8 billion in the next year, the United States of America’s endowment jumped almost double that of the initial year in 2009. Following this, the figure escalated to more than 22 billion in 2010.
Compared to the USA, the amount of money provided by the European nations and other countries was a small number. In 2006, both nations donated 3.3 billion and 2.7 billion, unlikely changing in the next following two-year. Then, the donation of European nations and other countries saw a small decreased in 2009. The former reduced by 0.1 billion, while the latter was half of one billion. In the last reported year, both nations increased their aids by 0,3 billion and 0.9 billion respectively.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | oxfordpro111 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | JennieD | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 84
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree with this statement 76
- some people get into debt by buying things they don't need and cant afford.what are the reasons for this behaviors?what action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 56
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 88
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28865979381 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29605622048 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8515846498 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193518241912 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083739123396 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691157829727 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123929207718 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634701131708 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.