The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided pie charts illustrate the average proportion of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar, which all of them can be harmful if consumed in big figures, in typical meals of USA citizens.
Overall it can be seen that there is a significant difference amongst the charts.
According to the data, 43% of sodium is eaten at diners, while only 14% at breakfasts and snacks. Moving on to the second chart, saturated fat is accounted for 37% during dinners, whereas at lunches only 26%. Finally, nearly half of the added sugar can be consumed in snacks (42%), followed by dinners with nearly a quarter (23%).
Comparing this information, it can be observed that dinners have the biggest amount of sodium and saturated fat, whereas snacks have the largest share in added sugar. Breakfasts are composed of the least percentage of all the nutrients.
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you 78
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and inclu 78
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97902097902 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58692114025 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65034965035 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9980563204 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119900744079 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597707412321 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545638296787 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764021011404 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479722046705 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.