Many people buy products that they do not really need and replace old products with new ones unnecessarily.
Why do people but things they do not really need?
Do you think this is good thing?
Nowadays, we are surrounded by more stuff compared to the past. Shopping is no longer just a measure to live on but an entertainment itself. We easily get new goods and throw the old goods away at the same time. In other words, the speed of consumption and waste are accelerating.
Behind the consumer behavior, there are two causes related to technology development. Firstly, internet enabled online shopping, which allows us to buy various products wherever and whenever. Also, we do not have to care the size or weight of products because they will be delivered. That convenient system fosters our unnecessary shopping. Secondly, mass production culture in modern society provides us cheap and varied commodities like clothing, cosmetics and stationary. It means that we can afford more things at the same budget. Furthermore, we tend to treat cheap products poorly because they are replaceable.
However, it gives a bad impact on both society and environment. More demand drives more production, which results in mass waste. Not only resource shortage and over-wasting, but also poor working condition is caused by harsh competition in manufacturing market. Workers at factories are payed less for cutting costs of production as the markets become competitive.
Therefore, the situation that people buy and waste stuff at a high speed is not preferable. Due to technology development, we enjoy owing a lot of products easily. However the outcome is a system which exhausts workers and nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-20 | Ronald88 | 95 | view |
| 2021-05-14 | husan shergill | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | lovey.airon | 78 | view |
- Many people buy products that they do not really need and replace old products with new ones unnecessarily Why do people but things they do not really need Do you think this is good thing 87
- Everybody should be allowed admission to university study programs regardless of their levels of academic skills.To what extent do you agree with the idea? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, we are surrounded by more stuf...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umption and waste are accelerating. Behind the consumer behavior, there are ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...poorly because they are replaceable. However, it gives a bad impact on both s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n as the markets become competitive. Therefore, the situation that people buy...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e enjoy owing a lot of products easily. However the outcome is a system which exhausts ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09057707664 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6225060013 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.3333333333 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3333333333 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152427254818 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375700929144 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485359763167 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761186215617 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531641583042 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.