Government should build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport improve public transport.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in government made new roads and improve network of public transport. There is widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are number of arguments is in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one in those governments should build more roads to allow more vehicle owner and improve public transport can not only contribute to after make good roads so many problem can solve like traffic, road accidents, pollution in control. But also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience needless, to say all these merits stand one is good stead, as far argument their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are however, some pitfalls that can easily over whelm the potential benefits of good roads but they are no of problem birth like, maximum money, so many employers and lot of lands. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend. People not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of make good roads and improve public transport so many problems solve are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-06 | English time | 77 | view |
- More information available online, so library books are useless. Agree or disagree. 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development. To what extent do you agree? 77
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and into regional area. Discuss its advantages and disadvantages? 85
- Experience is more effective way to teach compared to books. Agree or disagree? 72
- Personal development is the based for professional development. To what extent do you agree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hicle owner and improve public transport can not only contribute to after make g...
^^
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic transport can not only contribute to after make good roads so many problem ca...
^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...contribute to after make good roads so many problem can solve like traffic, road accidents,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ial benefits of good roads but they are no of problem birth like, maximum money, s...
^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s solve are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92673992674 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62638639832 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578754578755 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.726236592 50.4703680194 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 7.25397266985 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283673049881 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906873351231 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151339239326 0.071462118173 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157712717888 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926669534496 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.