In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
It is witnessed that despite there are plenty of technological advancements applied in enhancing agriculture, many people living in some areas still face starvation or food scarcity. From my perspective, while climate change is the predominant cause of this problem, I believe that certain methods should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, the major reason that climate change is a contributing factor in the deficiency of food among people is that although advanced technologies have a positive impact in improving agriculture, extreme weather conditions or disasters such as droughts, floods or storms are inevitable. These not only put a threat to the productivity of millions of hectares of crops and grain yields but also cause farmers to suffer food shortages. This is illustrated by the fact that prolonged droughts result in a weakening of moisture during the summer, which causes Vietnamese farmers to find it extremely difficult to meet their daily needs.
However, in order to get rid of this problem, proper solutions should not be ignored. First, governments should invest their budget in advanced sensor technology detecting upcoming weather conditions. This could help farmers have sufficient time for preparing and taking necessary actions to save their crops. Second, it is also necessary to send experienced scientists and experts, researching and investigating regions suffered from climate change, to find effective methods for improvements.
In conclusion, although advancements could benefit one’s own country in some aspects, I believe that applying mentioned methods would prevent people from facing the deficiency of food sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin27 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Iruki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | aria etemadi | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | JiaYanLi | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Do you think this is a positive or negative development 82
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 56
- Some people say the government should spend money on providing faster public transport while others believe the government should give priority to other factors such as cost and the effect on the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66403162055 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02079737261 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2276157113 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.3 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164306214243 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644996818278 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500382832918 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101311563518 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557528198547 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.