When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
Success of people depends upon hard work rather than luck. They essay will discuss why hard work is necessary to be a successful person.
To become successful in life it is necessary to do hard work. There are many real life examples of people who became successful solely because of their hard work. For example, football player Ronald was poor, but it did not stop him as did hard work to perfect his talent of football playing and made a name for himself. Therefore, people who work hard to achieve something nothing will stop them from achieving them.
On other hand, luck just makes you successful for the short time. People who become successful because just because of luck will become unsuccessful as soon as their luck runs out. For example, people who wins lottery will have money and success only till they have the money and once money is gone they will back where they were. Hard work will make people successful for the long, which is evident from the real life examples where as luck only make people successful for the short time.
In my opinion, hard work is more important than luck because of the above mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-07 | nevermind123 | 55 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 77
- Companies should encourage old employees to retire. The elderly people of over 50 years of age should be retired and be replaced by young. Do you agree or disagree? 87
- Many students take part time jobs while studying in university Do you think it is a good idea or a bad idea 74
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 55
- Protection of wild animals is a waste of resources Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to preserve these animals is wastage of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... is evident from the real life examples where as luck only make people successful for th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 1207.87684729 78% => OK
No of words: 201.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71144278607 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16369297451 2.71678728327 80% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 139.433497537 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512437810945 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 379.143842365 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0084930294 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0909090909 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258788130144 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12913593071 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600227960884 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174790747841 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169863636492 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.1260098522 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.9458128079 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.5310837438 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.32886699507 79% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 55.0591133005 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.