Companies should encourage old employees to retire. The elderly people of over 50 years of age should be retired and be replaced by young. Do you agree or disagree?
These days, it has become a trend to see companies retiring their old employees and hiring the young people. As such, it has both merits and demerits, although I am opinion that the former outdo the latter. I lay reasons to support my argument with relevant examples.
There are myriads of argument in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that young people brings energy and enthusiasm, which can take company to the top. People not only realised the positive impact of hiring young people such as they are better at use technology compare to old people, but also measured the gravity of its relevance. Needless to say, all these upsides put companies in good stead as far as hiring youth is concerned.
There, however, are some pitfalls which can overwhelm the potential benefits of retiring old people. The primary one lies in that old employees have lot of experience, which can be useful in difficult situations. Another overt aspect of this argument is that old people can teach the coming young generation different things which can be useful to boost their career. Hence, it is apparent from aforementioned discussion why many are concerned about retiring old employee and hiring young one.
In view of above outline argument one can conclude, despite having some drawbacks, the benefits of hiring youth are indeed too great.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | nevermind123 | 87 | view |
- Tobacco should be treated as illegal like other drugs. Smoking has not a single positive issue but lots of negative effects and therefore, it should be banned. 55
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation. Why is this the case? What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people? 77
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 62
- Protection of wild animals is a waste of resources Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to preserve these animals is wastage of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00884955752 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5217046694 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606194690265 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8201944932 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176658305104 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649710878915 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552878612009 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956588668036 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624652725099 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 87.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 79.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.