The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given plans depict how grange park has been modified since it was constructed in 1920.
Overall, it can be witnessed that the fountain which was the centre of attraction has been replaced by the rose garden. On the other hand, the area dominated by glasshouse has been swapped by a water feature.
Analyzing the alterations profoundly, at the time of opening of grange park, the fountain was the chief attraction. currently, it has been removed and that area is allotted to a huge rose garden surrounded by the seating arrangements. Moreover, on the place of glasshouse in the current plan, a water feature is built.
Moving towards the further modifications, the amphitheatre for concerts has occupied the space of the stage for musicians. In the same way, café and children’s play area has been built on the place where Rosegarden and Pond for water plants were stood. On the other hand, only one of the smaller rose gardens remains on the north side of the park and the seats have been taken off.
Finally, along with the original entrances, a third entrance has been added near the water feature from an underground park to make the park more accessible.
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simple lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however believe, technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give y 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 61
- PIE CHART ON DIFFERENT EXPENDITURES ON MOVIE 78
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 73
- prevention is better than cure 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Currently
... the fountain was the chief attraction. currently, it has been removed and that area is a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, third, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.865 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72477063255 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8689277286 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12173996666 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486363040394 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049445388313 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762552803299 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445026751647 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.