Keeping your surrounding clean and well presented is quite mandatory for some individuals. In my point of view, everyone should keep their place neat and organized regardless of whether it is a house or office area.
To begin with, since childhood our parents teach us to clean our rooms, arrange books, make the bed, and various cleanliness habits. It enforces a sense of responsibility among children, which carries forward to adulthood. By keeping a clean house one may provide positive vibes to their friends and family, hence people feel more welcomed and happy to see a clean house, one may be perceived as very organized and healthy as per other people. Moreover, cleaning reduces stress, and anxiety, people feel happy to see their house clean and decluttered. Similarly, cleaning workplace signifies level of professionalism and management. For example, if people maintain a clean office area, it is easier for them to find files, folders, and vital documents, moreover, a client may get impressed by his or her commitment and dedication towards work and workplace.
On the contrary, not cleaning your house may invite several germs and bacterias, which may cause illness and sickness among adults and children. People who are not habitual of regular cleaning, they may find their home cluttered and unmanaged, cleaning a really dirty house or workplace would be time-consuming and may cause stress and anxiety. Other people might not find untidiness alluring and they might decline to visit your house.
In conclusion, by investing time and energy in cleaning house or workplace, people can enhance their reputation in society, also they can easily find their belongings by decluttering their houses.
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. Do 78
- Some people think that genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- some people think that Genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 61
- Rising University fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chance of employment. To 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... see their house clean and decluttered. Similarly cleaning workplace signifies level of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Similarly cleaning workplace signifies level of professionalism and management....
^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...moreover, a client may get impressed by individuals commitment and dedication towards work ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, moreover, really, similarly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32352941176 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78834543093 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2373722114 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127392477788 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052679203079 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330317937351 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839241155851 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449872577559 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.