The pie chart shows the main reasons what agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990s.
The given statistical illustration represented in the form of pie chart depicted about some reason behind the damaging worldwide land and tubular form of information shows affectation over three countries in 1990.
In the pie chart illustrate about the large part of land was damaging by use for over grazing, it covers 35% and 28% of deforestation and over cultivation respectively, other 7% of land was damaged by the other purposes.
In the table form, it shows that land reduction in three countries. Reduce forest area more in Europe than other two, Europe was 9.8 percent and other Oceania and North America were given 1.7 and 0.2 percent respectively. Excess grazing shows in the Oceania over the 11% and then Europe got 5.5% and followed by 1.5% in North America. More cultivation did not see in the Oceania, Europe has 7.7% and North America has 3.3% in all. In total Europe land degradation is higher than other two, it was 23% and then Oceania and North America has 13% and 5% respectively.
Overall, grazing and deforestation are more affected of all land degradation in Europe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | Bholo | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | Ariuntungalag | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | Jagroop Brar | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | DavinderPB46 | 67 | view |
- The pie chart shows the main reasons what agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The table shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 56
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity of 2014. 78
- Too much emphasis is being placed on going university for academic education. People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a shortage of qualified tradespeople.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The diagram shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73059124751 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518918918919 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2611490676 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153666995674 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854269976913 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849044926014 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105053793694 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521459436468 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.