Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, youth level of freedom and also rules which restrict them have been in dispute. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether or not the rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Some people possess the conviction that nowadays, young people is more limited and restricted than the past whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that in today’s world, they have more freedom in comparison with previous years. I personally contend that in the modern era, there are not strict regulations which young people must obey them. The following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that freedom is a sense which everybody enjoys and wants to achieve it. In the modern era, by advancement of technology and as a result, ways of communication, people are well aware of what events are occurring in all parts of the world. In other worlds, for example, a supposed young person in India knows about activities and beliefs of another youth in Switzerland. This phenomenon which can be related to globalization, have had some consequences which one of them is more freedom of young people from cumbersome rules.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that psychologically, human beings inclined toward have got as much as freedom he can. Indeed, humans, inherently detest restrictions. They want to do and experience lots of works. In my view, this strong tendency leads to less obedience of people from others. By way of illustration, consider and comprise the approaches of finding jobs and getting married of young people in past and recent. In today’s world, young people choose professions in which they are interested. On the contrary, in past, most of the youth had to continue their ancestors’ jobs. They had to get engaged with a man/woman whom their parents suggest but now it is not a case. Had there were more strict rules, they could not decide like in this way.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that not only they do not follow and obey strict rules, they enjoy an unprecedented freedom. All in all, it is highly recommended that parents be conscious about merits and demerits of this freedom and consult their youth.
- Do you agree or disagree?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- The reading claims that living on the Moon and Mars is feasible while, it is not possible on the Venus because it's conditions are absolutely tough and inhospitable. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts a shadow of doubt on the re 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...is often raised regarding this issue is whether or not the rules that societies today expect y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
... reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...h they are interested. On the contrary, in past, most of the youth had to continue thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 735, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...est but now it is not a case. Had there were more strict rules, they could not decid...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey could not decide like in this way. In conclusion, contemplating all the afo...
^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'unprecedented freedom'.
Suggestion: unprecedented freedom
...ollow and obey strict rules, they enjoy an unprecedented freedom. All in all, it is highly recommended t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0897755611 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82524821475 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5536159601 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1927380422 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.05 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.05 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199893876165 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609206315327 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738000882891 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1244325895 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808323016121 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.