The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line chart provided illustrates how many grams of four different type of meats ware consumed by people in a Europe nation in a week from 1979 to 2004.
during the reported year, it is evident that the consuming of chicken experienced an increase, while three remaining types of meat (beef, lamb, and fish) witnessed a downward trend.
Generally, in 1979, the chicken was not popular kind of meat consumed in a European country. it much smaller (140 grams) compares to the remaining types of meat. However, between 1979 and 1989, the number of consumed chicken increased gradually and surpassed the figure of beef in 1990, accounted for around 210 grams. Afterward, the number of consumed chicken fluctuated and reached the highest figure at around 260 grams in the 2000s, and ending the period with 250 grams.
beef, on the other hand, started the period as the highest figure (just above 200 grams). From 1979 and 1984, the number fluctuated and remain stable at around 235 grams between 1985 and 1987. Following that, the consumption of beef exponentially decreased to about 100 grams at the end of the reported year.
Two remaining kinds of meat (lamb and fish) stood at around 150 and just above 50 grams each. during the period, the number of consumed lamb revealed a declining trend to about 70 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, the number of fish consumption slightly changed during the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph and table below show the changes in the number of overseas visitors and top 5 visitor countries to Britain in 2004 and 2005. 67
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below illustrate the average bed use in three typical hospitals internationally and the proportion of hospital budgets allocated to in patient care before and after day surgery was introduced in 2003 68
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...e nation in a week from 1979 to 2004. during the reported year, it is evident that t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...of meat consumed in a European country. it much smaller 140 grams compares to the ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beef
... and ending the period with 250 grams. beef, on the other hand, started the period ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...round 150 and just above 50 grams each. during the period, the number of consumed lamb...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88185654008 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44132118686 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540084388186 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3824344367 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4166666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191960308081 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787238393374 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059023996626 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109675912269 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347267659147 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.