The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
The two pie charts illustrate the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years (1995 and 2005).
Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage was coal while the most negative trend was other.
In the one hand in 1995, the coal got 29,80% which the highest category, followed by gas which was 29,63%, then persentage petro got 29,27%, meanwhile percentage nuclear was number two fall down 6,40% and remain percentage other was the lowest 4,90%. On the other hand in 2005, percentage coal got 30,93%, followed percentage gas got 30,31%, so percentage petro got 19,55% and percentage nuclear got 10,10% also percentage other got 9,10%. meanwhile percentage the comparison of different kinds of energy production avarage increased significant was other got 4,2% and decreased was petro position minus -9,72%. The middle nuclear got 3,7% after that the percentage of different kind of energy production in the remain goal got 1,13% and partisicomment gas got 0,68%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- the pie chart show the average house hold expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the years 2010 61
- the pie charts below show the avarage household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 61
- the two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sector in Canada in 2005 and 2010 78
- the graph below gives information about internet user in three countries between 1999 and 2009. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. make comparisons where relevant. 56
- in some countries, young people are encourage to work or travel foe a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two pie charts illustrate the comparison of different kinds of energy production ...
^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d remain percentage other was the lowest 4,90%. On the other hand in 2005, percen...
^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...10,10% also percentage other got 9,10%. meanwhile percentage the comparison of different...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: meanwhile,
...10,10% also percentage other got 9,10%. meanwhile percentage the comparison of different...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge other got 9,10%. meanwhile percentage the comparison of different kinds of ene...
^^
Line 4, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... petro position minus -9,72%. The middle nuclear got 3,7% after that the percenta...
^^
Line 4, column 712, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... different kind of energy production in the remain goal got 1,13% and partisicomment gas g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24223602484 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64043104152 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509316770186 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1574385624 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187989563684 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171186453174 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.237553578162 0.0843802449381 282% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255234688507 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.300400480926 0.0819641961636 367% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.