Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only make our lives more complicated.
Technology has become increasingly integrated with our daily lives over the past few decades. Recent products of technology such as social media, smartphones, and similar gadgets have raised questions about whether technology is still a panacea as it was heralded to be at dawn of its advent. While technology does have a lot of demerits, like all tools, I believe that it has done more to simplify than complicate our lives.
Technology has exponentially increased our capacity and range of communication over the past century. The internet has been a boon to our generation, and we often take it for granted. It is possible now for people to work for and interact with people all over the globe. The free-flowing exchange of ideas and discoveries among bright scientists, artists, musicians, and people from all walks of life is going to propel us even further in the coming years, and this is all thanks to technology.
However, the internet has brought along, with all of its gifts, a lot of confusion as well. People send texts and communicate with their loved ones with their fingertips rather than waiting for days for the postal services to deliver them a short letter which has led to a whole new acronyms and emoji based language. This has added to the confusion and evolved into humans learning to interpret tones and hidden meanings in small texts. It has adversely affected social interactions among humans as we get accustomed to our lives in front of screens.
With the progress in communication technology, we have moved on from getting our news from reputed newspapers and a few channels on the radio to having round-the-clock new at the tip of our fingertips. This has its distinct benefits with the "common man" also able to freely express his/her views on the web and let their voices be heard. However, this has given rise to "citizen journalism," which has ingrained in itself a blatant oversight for accountability and verification of the truth and the sham. Whose story is to be believed and who is the one purporting bogus lies for their benefit. This has led to a lot of chaos, and innocent people have been caught in the crossfire.
In conclusion, technology is a tool, and using it the right way is a responsibility that rests on the shoulders on every man and woman reaping its benefits. As mentioned above, things like the internet, social media, and other communication tools, all have their pros and cons. It is up to us to decide when, where, and how to use it to simplify our lives rather than adding to the chaos.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only make our lives more complicated. 83
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 70
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 58
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...s given rise to 'citizen journalism,' which has ingrained in itself a blatan...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87045454545 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86682272222 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.396424471 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.789473684 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156326828678 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052574940726 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722968759192 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910956235838 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043957169227 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.