Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Working is a catch-all term referring to any activity that people do in order to bear the expenses of life. Every individual seeks a decent job to build a prosperous future. As far as I'm concerned, the way that people can find a suitable career for themselves is a way harder than it used to be. Two main factors are contributing to this matter elaborated hereunder.
The first factor is that as there used to be fewer job variations in the past, people could identify the best career for themselves with less effort. To be more specific, it is believed that when humans encounter a wide range of a different subjects, it sparks confusion to scrutinize every aspect of their merits and drawbacks, and therefore, they could not distinguish the best one. The same concept is true about opting for a suitable career out of a myriad of job opportunities in the modern era. For instance, back in a time when people were living in villages, there were a handful of livelihoods and people had to either work as a farmer or shepherd. As a result, people weren't overwhelmed by different working options, and they could simply start to make a living at an early age. However, in recent years, the confusion arising from various job positions is hindering people's ability to identify the most assuring career for them.
The second decisive point is that population growth has led to an increasing number of experts in every field, resulting in a tough competition among individuals in order to be successful in their own specialties. Nowadays, when someone tries to show his potential in a specific area, he needs to defeat all the competitors in order to achieve success in the long run. For example, Consider a person who was captivated by serving as a doctor several years ago. Since there weren't many accomplished doctors available, people had to pay the existing ones for treatment. As a result, whoever started their career in medical science could make enough money to build a thriving future. On the other hand, with the upsurge in the number of skillful doctors, one has to work diligently to earn a good reputation for his ability of curing patients, attracting patients to schedule an appointment at their office.
According to the above analysis, it is safe to say that the procedure of finding a suitable job for a secure future is going to be a much more arduous path for everyone. It is because job diversification is confusing people in this process and because an intense competition in each particular career among people is blocking their way of identifying a proper job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | catherine0915 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country that from traveling to foreign countries. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is impossibleto always be completely honest with your friends. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past It was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...to build a prosperous future. As far as Im concerned, the way that people can find...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'subject'?
Suggestion: subject
...s encounter a wide range of a different subjects, it sparks confusion to scrutinize ever...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...farmer or shepherd. As a result, people werent overwhelmed by different working option...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...a doctor several years ago. Since there werent many accomplished doctors available, pe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82247191011 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78178830403 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54606741573 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5343520955 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7222222222 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121965910811 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412511192983 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412472434511 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776413027204 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118121060502 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.