the pie chart show the average house hold expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the years 2010
Two pie chart show the ratio average household expenditures on five major category in japan and malaysia by 2010. Overall, it cab be seen that the highest percentage average household expenditures by malaysia was housing while the most negative malaysia was healthy care.
In the one hand by japan, there was a dramatic fall health care which got 6%. Meanwhile housing, tranport, food, other goods and service got a minimal climb 20% with position tranport which was 20%, average housing noted 21%, average food marked 24%, average other goods and service noted 29%. However they was compare by malaysia average household expenditures higher than japan, housing counted 34% also a go down more smally got healthy care 3%.
On the other hand by japan and malaysia, there was different average increase sharply housing the amount of 13%. Whereas went then the other four category a maintain the same lavel the amount of 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-13 | eka trisna | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | RAHMAYANI | 61 | view |
- the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 41
- the graph below shohs the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in european country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- the two pie chart show changes in world population by region between 1990 and 2000 91
- the pie charts below show the avarage household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 61
- in some countries, young people are encourage to work or travel foe a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...ge household expenditures on five major category in japan and malaysia by 2010. Overall,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cabs'?
Suggestion: cabs
...japan and malaysia by 2010. Overall, it cab be seen that the highest percentage ave...
^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...dramatic fall health care which got 6%. Meanwhile housing, tranport, food, other goods an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rage other goods and service noted 29%. However they was compare by malaysia average h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vice noted 29%. However they was compare by malaysia average household expenditur...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ease sharply housing the amount of 13%. Whereas went then the other four category a mai...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...f 13%. Whereas went then the other four category a maintain the same lavel the amount of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ereas went then the other four category a maintain the same lavel the amount of 3%.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09150326797 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35143379457 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7592197776 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349537143365 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175095021239 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145625582282 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248259955093 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129863666391 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.